Cast manifold inspection releases a part for machining when four things line up: the as-cast surface has no repairable defect, the key dimensions sit inside CT5–CT7, the heat-treatment record is complete, and the datum faces have enough stock to reach 0.05–0.10 mm flatness after cutting. Thread engagement of at least 1.5×D is checked after machining, not before.
The gate is a release to the next operation, not a statement that the part is good for the customer. Keeping those two ideas separate is what stops a casting record from being read as a certification.
The first is the as-cast surface. Cold shuts, sand inclusions and visible cracks are reject criteria because none of them can be machined away without changing the wall. A surface that is merely rough is not a reject; it is a machining allowance question.
The second is the dimensional set. Flange thickness, port spacing, runner bore and overall length are checked against CT5–CT7, and the casting drawing should say which dimensions are as-cast and which are machined, because only the first set belongs to this gate.
The third is the heat-treatment record. Stress relief before machining is normal for a manifold, and the record has to show the cycle, the temperature and the fixture. A part without that record is not released, even when the dimensions pass.
The fourth is the datum condition. The faces that will be used for location in machining must have stock, and the stock has to be enough to remove the as-cast bow without cutting into the wall. That is the 0.5–1.5 mm allowance the pattern was supposed to leave.
A fifth check sits behind the four: the casting has to be identifiable. A heat number, a lot number and a part number on the release sheet are what let the same part be traced when a later machining problem appears, and a release without them is a release for a part that cannot be found again.
As-cast flatness is not the acceptance number. A manifold can arrive with 0.3–1 mm of bow on the flange face and still be released, because the bow sits inside the machining stock and will be cut away.
What is accepted at the gate is the stock, not the flatness. The check is whether the minimum stock on the datum face is still positive after the bow is removed; a part that is 0.2 mm thin on one side of the flange has no material to cut and is released to scrap, not to machining.
After machining, the number changes. The finished flange is checked at 0.05–0.10 mm, and that check belongs to the machining release, not to the casting gate. Mixing the two is how a good casting gets rejected for a bow that was planned for.
Where the drawing is ambiguous, the safe reading is the stricter one. If a dimension is marked as-cast but the tolerance is only reachable after machining, the release gate should treat it as machined and say so, rather than passing a part that fails the drawing later.
It does not prove customer acceptance. The record is a supplier-side release; the customer's own first-article or PPAP process is a separate gate with its own paperwork.
It does not prove dyno or fatigue performance. A manifold that passes inspection can still fail a pressure cycle or a thermal cycle, and those tests are not part of a dimensional release.
It does not prove material certification unless the certificate is explicitly part of the order. A heat number and a mill certificate are separate documents; the inspection record references them but does not replace them.
Finally, it does not prove the next casting. A release applies to the parts inspected, and a new lot needs its own record even when the pattern and the process are unchanged.
Send the casting drawing and the inspection requirements to Neway; we will confirm which features belong to the release gate and which belong to machining.