How does the strength of 3D printed titanium compare to traditionally manufactured titanium parts?

Table of Contents
How Does the Strength of 3D Printed Titanium Compare to Traditionally Manufactured Titanium Parts?
Comparable or Superior Tensile and Yield Strength
Post-Processing Enhances Mechanical Properties
Fatigue and Creep Resistance
Microstructure Differences
Summary Comparison Table
Recommended Services to Maximize Strength

How Does the Strength of 3D Printed Titanium Compare to Traditionally Manufactured Titanium Parts?

Comparable or Superior Tensile and Yield Strength

When processed correctly, 3D printed titanium—particularly Ti-6Al-4V—can match or even exceed the mechanical strength of wrought or machined titanium parts. Using Powder Bed Fusion or Electron Beam Melting (EBM), the as-printed tensile strength of Ti-6Al-4V typically ranges from 950 to 1100 MPa, with yield strength between 850 and 1000 MPa—values comparable to forged Grade 5 titanium components.

Post-Processing Enhances Mechanical Properties

Additive parts may initially contain residual stress, anisotropic grain structures, or internal porosity. However, applying heat treatment and Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) improves ductility, eliminates porosity, and enhances fatigue strength. After HIP, mechanical properties can reach or exceed those of traditionally forged or annealed titanium.

For example, 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V ELI used in medical implants achieves both biocompatibility and strength requirements in line with ASTM F3001 standards.

Fatigue and Creep Resistance

While static strength is comparable, fatigue strength can be lower in as-printed parts due to surface roughness or internal defects. This is especially relevant in high-cycle fatigue conditions like aerospace and automotive applications.

Solution: Finishing techniques such as electropolishing, CNC machining, and HIP restore fatigue performance to levels equal to or better than traditional parts.

Microstructure Differences

3D printed titanium typically exhibits a fine acicular α’ martensitic structure in the as-built condition, while traditionally manufactured titanium may have equiaxed or lamellar microstructures. With proper post-processing, the microstructure of printed parts can be tuned for specific strength-ductility profiles.

Summary Comparison Table

Property

3D Printed Titanium (Post-Processed)

Traditional Titanium (Forged/Annealed)

Tensile Strength

950–1100 MPa

900–1050 MPa

Yield Strength

850–1000 MPa

830–970 MPa

Elongation at Break

10–14% (with HIP)

10–15%

Fatigue Strength (Rough)

Lower (Ra > 10 µm)

Higher (machined finish)

Fatigue Strength (Polished)

Comparable or higher

Standard

Neway offers a complete set of services to match or exceed conventional titanium performance: