English

What is the accuracy of your 3D scanning system, and how does it compare to CMM?

Table of Contents
Our 3D Scanning System Capabilities
Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) Capabilities
Comparative Analysis: Application-Based Selection
Integrated Quality Workflow
Industry-Specific Implementation
Accuracy Verification and Traceability

Our advanced 3D scanning systems deliver exceptional measurement capabilities with specific accuracy profiles that make them ideal for various applications, while coordinate measuring machines (CMM) remain the gold standard for certain critical measurements. The choice between technologies depends on your specific requirements for speed, density, and precision.

Our 3D Scanning System Capabilities

Structured Light Scanning Systems:

  • Volumetric Accuracy: ±0.025 mm to ±0.085 mm depending on measurement volume

  • Point Spacing: 0.05 mm to 0.2 mm for high-resolution capture

  • Point Accuracy: ±0.015 mm to ±0.040 mm per individual measurement

  • Resolution: Capable of capturing up to 8,000,000 points per measurement

Laser Scanning Systems:

  • Volumetric Accuracy: ±0.025 mm to ±0.200 mm based on working distance

  • Measurement Rate: Up to 2,000,000 points per second

  • Single Point Repeatability: ±0.015 mm under ideal conditions

These systems are particularly valuable for Reverse Engineering and first-article inspection of complex geometries produced through Powder Bed Fusion and Material Extrusion processes.

Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) Capabilities

Traditional Bridge CMM Systems:

  • Volumetric Accuracy: ±0.0015 mm to ±0.005 mm (substantially higher than scanning)

  • Single Point Repeatability: ±0.0005 mm to ±0.001 mm

  • Measurement Uncertainty: Typically 1.5-3.0 μm depending on machine class

  • Sparse Data Collection: Limited to programmed points rather than full surfaces

CMM technology remains essential for validating critical dimensions of precision components made from Titanium Alloy and Stainless Steel for Aerospace and Aviation applications.

Comparative Analysis: Application-Based Selection

When 3D Scanning Excels:

  • Complex Surface Capture: Organic shapes, freeform surfaces, and intricate details

  • High-Point Density Requirements: Full-field analysis for Surface Treatment validation

  • Large Parts: Scanning of automotive panels or aerospace structures

  • Speed-Critical Applications: Rapid capture of complete geometries in minutes

  • Soft Materials: Non-contact measurement of flexible components or Plastics

When CMM Delivers Superior Results:

  • Dimensional Tolerances: Validation of critical holes, planes, and features below 0.01 mm

  • Reference Measurements: Establishing gold standard for scanner calibration

  • Hard Probe Access: Internal features easily reached with styli

  • Stable Environments: Temperature-controlled metrology labs

  • Simple Geometries: Primarily prismatic features with clear datum structures

Integrated Quality Workflow

Combined Approach for Comprehensive Validation:

  1. CMM for Critical Features: Establish datum structure and measure tight-tolerance features

  2. 3D Scanning for Surfaces: Capture complete surface form and complex contours

  3. Data Fusion: Combine both datasets in a common reference frame for a complete assessment

This methodology is particularly effective for Medical and Healthcare components requiring both precise dimensional accuracy and complex anatomical surface conformity.

Industry-Specific Implementation

Automotive Applications: For Automotive components, we typically employ:

  • Scanning for body panels and styling surfaces

  • CMM for engine mounting points and critical interfaces

Aerospace Components:

  • Scanning for turbine blade profiles and airfoil sections

  • CMM for mounting interfaces and bolt hole patterns

Medical Devices:

  • Scanning for custom implant surfaces contacting bone

  • CMM for modular connection features and screw threads

Accuracy Verification and Traceability

Both our scanning and CMM systems undergo:

  • Regular Calibration: Traceable to national standards

  • Artifact Verification: Using certified reference standards

  • Uncertainty Analysis: Comprehensive measurement uncertainty budgets

  • Interoperability Testing: Ensuring data alignment between technologies

For the highest accuracy requirements, we recommend a hybrid approach that leverages the strengths of both technologies, particularly for components that require both form verification and dimensional validation.